The following Scripture passages are offered to aid beginning fellowships. The readings and commentary for this week are more in line with what has become usual; for the following will most likely be familiar observations. The concept behind this Sabbath’s selection is typology of mental landscapes.
Weekly Readings
For the Sabbath of August 25, 2007
The person conducting the Sabbath service should open services with two or three hymns, or psalms, followed by an opening prayer acknowledging that two or three (or more) are gathered together in Christ Jesus’ name, and inviting the Lord to be with them.
The person conducting the service should now read or assign to be read Matthew chapters 24, verses 1 through 31.
Commentary: During this past week, a
blogger contacted one of the websites loosely associated with The Philadelphia Church and wanted a
link placed to his site so that war could be avoided between the
When Jesus’ first disciples pointed out the magnificence of Herod’s temple two days before Calvary—when Jesus’ mind was on what He knew He had to suffer—He told them, “‘You see all these [the buildings of the temple], do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down’” (Matt 24:2) … yet the Wailing Wall is one stone upon another.
Since the Wailing Wall
remains as part of Herod’s temple, how should Jesus’ words be
taken? Obviously, the temple was destroyed and most of the stones were cast
down when Roman soldiers sacked
· If Jesus is the stone that was rejected and if disciples are living stones, then the stones to be cast down were the religious leaders of the second temple.
· When false witnesses testified against Jesus, they could only agree that Jesus said, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and in three days I will build another, not made with hands (Mark 14:58).
Certainly Jesus did not destroy Herod’s
temple. Roman soldiers did. But Jesus did, three days after
Approximately forty minutes later (after a walk of two miles), the disciples came to Jesus and asked one question of two parts that could be broken into three things:
1. When will the temple be cast down;
2. What will be the sign of Jesus’ coming [the Second Advent];
3. What will be the sign of the close of the age?
Jesus answered His
disciples’ question. He didn’t answer a question that they
didn’t ask, such as what will be the course of history between
The disciples’ question specifically referenced what Jesus had said about the buildings of the temple, with their apparent assumption being that the temple would be cast down at the end of the age. And because His disciples assumed that the temple built of physical stones would be cast down at the end of the age, Jesus begins His discourse with a warning about leading astray:
· Jesus said, blepō mē tis planaō humas A literal translation would be, See to it not someone you deceive.
So what in virtually every English translation is some form of “‘Beware that no one leads you astray,’” which has the object capable of being led astray being the disciples, a literal translation will have Jesus warning His disciples about leading someone astray … who might be the person who could have led His disciples astray? Satan. Who else? Certainly not the high priest or the Roman governor would lead His disciples astray. So it makes no sense for Jesus to warn His disciples about them being led astray, but it makes good sense for Jesus to warn His disciples about them leading others astray for He knew from the beginning who those were who did not believe and who it was who would betray Him (John 6:64). From the beginning, Jesus had with Him those who did not believe.
When Jesus breathed on the ten and said, “‘Receive the Holy Spirit’” (again, John 20:22), Jesus established another synagogue and began another sect of Judaism: the sect of the Nazarenes [i.e., the sect consisting of those Israelites who would be identified as Christians]. And those early teachers of this sect were the disciples whom Jesus had warned, See to it that you don’t deceive anyone.
· How could one of the ten (or eleven when Thomas is counted) deceive others?
Christendom is today divided between those disciples who believe Jesus and those disciples who do not … why profess to be a disciple of someone whom you do not believe? Why identify yourself as a Christian if you will not walk as Jesus walked (1 John 2:6) and imitate Paul (Phil 3:17) as he walked as Jesus walked?
Every Christian who will not identify himself or herself as part of a sect of observant Judaism stands before God as a rebel, a vessel of wrath endured for a season but destined for destruction. This Christian has been led astray by someone. If not by one of the first disciples, then by someone between the mid 1st-Century and the present age, with most of these “someones” tracing their theological roots back to those bishops who attended the Council of Nicea (ca 325 CE), where God formally delivered spiritually circumcised Israel to the spiritual king of Babylon for the same reasons that He sent physically circumcised Israel into Babylonian captivity almost ten centuries earlier.
· A person deceives in the name of Christ by placing importance on the flesh.
The Apostle Paul fought a
long running battle with the Circumcision Faction, those leading Jewish
converts to Christendom who contended that a convert must first be physically
circumcised before he could be spiritually circumcised. These leading men had
Scripture on their side, especially Exodus 12:48-49 and Ezekiel 44:9. But they
had wrongly divided the word of God. An era exists between natural
To say that
· Paul did not understand why sin and death continued to dwell in his fleshly members when he [the new creature that constituted personhood within his mind] had been set free from sin and death.
What Paul apparently did not realize is of those things that formed the example (1 Co 10:6, 11) of ancient Israel leaving Egypt representing Jesus’ disciples leaving sin, what hasn’t happened is the death of firstborns not covered by the blood of a paschal lamb. Liberation from bondage followed the death angel slaying uncovered firstborns, and did not precede the slaughter of firstborns.
Certainly Christendom
widely recognizes that Christ Jesus was the paschal Lamb of God; that He was
sacrificed at Calvary on the Preparation Day for the first High Day of
Unleavened Bread; that His death is the typological reality of Passover lambs
sacrificed in
Spiritually circumcised
Among those disciples who
practiced typological exegesis prior to the Protestant Reformation, the
assumption was that the death of firstborns was the death of the old self
through the sacrament of baptism; that baptism satisfied the typology of
firstborns not covered by the blood of the Lamb of God dying prior to
liberation from bondage. The assumption was that following baptism the immortal
soul of a Christian would leave its house
and go to heaven upon death. The house
would remain in sin; in this world, the spiritual equivalent of geographical
The above has a large hole in its logic, which sounds good as long a disciple doesn’t think critically about what’s being taught: upon His return, Jesus brings with Him the judgments of the saints (1 Co 4:5) so until He returns, the judgment of any saint cannot be known, for the Father has given all judgment to Jesus so that Jesus can give life to whom He will (John 5:21-22). Therefore, no Israelite can leave his house until morning, with this morning being when Jesus returns as the Messiah [the fourth day of the creation week]. But since fleshly bodies return to the death of the earth, the new creature born of Spirit that had dwelt in a tent of flesh “sleeps” under the altar of God until the fullness of those who will die as he has died has been reached (Rev 6:9-11), with physical sleep being analogous to death.
Prior to being born of Spirit, no human being has any life in the heavenly realm. Eternal life is the gift of God (Rom 6:23), not the gift of human parents. So the person who dies physically prior to being born of Spirit “sleeps” in the dust of the earth, awaiting resurrection in the great White Throne Judgment. This person had only the shallow breath [psuche] that came from the first Adam. But the disciple who has been born of Spirit has received life—a second breath [pneuma]—that came from heaven and shall return to heaven to sleep under the altar until its judgment is revealed (this new creature is neither male nor female, but a son of God as angels are “sons”).
Baptism is for the death of the old self, not for the death of the flesh which still must be liberated from indwelling sin and death. Human personhood or human nature is a received nature: it is the software that animates the flesh, where sin and death continue to reside. Thus, in computer terms, the flesh is the equivalent of the hardware and both the old human nature and the new nature are software programs that make the hardware work. The new nature must overwrite the old nature. If it doesn’t, then the old nature will infect the new nature with the virus of disobedience, and the new nature will perish in the second death. So baptism is for the death of the old nature—it is analogous to overwriting Word 97 with Word 2003. But neither software program will prevent a hard drive bearing from failing, thereby ending the functioning of the computer. A new nature will not prevent a heart from failing, thereby causing the death of the flesh.
The flesh dies because of its decay that comes from its bondage to sin. Without sin dwelling in the flesh, a person would live longer than did Methuselah (Gen 5:27). To make this real for doubters, when Israel is liberated from indwelling sin and death, an Israelite can still die but not from so-called natural causes for this Israelite will no longer be under the curse of Adam. This Israelite can be martyred. He can die from accidental mishaps, or he can live until he is changed in the twinkling of an eye at Christ Jesus’ return. Likewise, the Israelite born in the Millennium will be born liberated from indwelling sin and death for Satan will be bound in the bottomless pit: what today seems “normal” will be turned upside-down. Instead of humankind being in bondage to Satan, the present prince of this world, Satan will be bound while the saints rule this world. And the person born in the Millennium will live until Satan is released for a short while. Then those human beings who take sin into themselves will die forever while those who do not will be changed [glorified] in the twinkling of an eye.
Until first Israel then
all of humankind is liberated from indwelling sin and death through empowerment
by the Holy Spirit [being filled with the Spirit] during the seven endtime
years, Israel remains in bondage to indwelling sin and death—and Grace
remains necessary because of this indwelling lawlessness. A spiritually
circumcised new creature dwelling in a fleshy body is analogous to the
physically circumcised Israelite born into a house in
Spiritually circumcised Israel presently lives through the long night of waiting and watching—the night that ancient Israel was not to leave their houses, with (again) the houses of ancient Israel equating to the tents of flesh in which born of Spirit sons of God presently dwell.
Now returning to Matthew chapter 24 — verse 9 begins the seven endtime years of tribulation. Everything that occurs after verse 9 occurs during the Tribulation, with verse 15 marking 1290 days before all things are restored (cf. Dan 12:11 & 11:31; 2 Thess 2:4; Matt 24:15). Thus, the events described in verses 9-14 occur during the first half of the Tribulation, as do the events described in Revelation chapters 4 through 11, and as do events described in Daniel chapter 7.
Therefore, what Jesus tells His first disciples in His Olivet discourse will have verses 5 though 8 answering His disciples’ question concerning casting down the stones forming the temple as well as what will be the sign of His coming prior to the period of tribulation. And the primary sign will be many coming in His name, saying that He is the Christ, and leading many astray.
Has there ever been a
time when as many have come in Jesus’ name as in this present era? No.
Not even close. And what do these many teach? Do they teach disciples to walk
as Jesus walked, an observant Jew? Do they teach disciples to imitate Paul, who
said in his defense “‘Neither against the law of the Jews, nor
against the temple, nor against Caesar have I committed any
offense’” (Acts 25:8)? No, they do not. Rather, they teach that
because Jesus kept the Law, disciples do not have to keep the law. Well, Paul
kept the law decades after
In His Olivet discourse,
Jesus said that wars and rumors of wars are not signs of the end of the age. He
said that those things which can be physically observed such as kingdom arising
against kingdom, famines, earthquakes or other unmentioned other natural
disasters are only the beginning the birth pains of Israel bringing to life the
endtime harvest of the sons of God. Hence, it is false prophets and false
teachers who point to physical events as fulfillments of endtime prophecies
concerning
The would-be teacher of
Endtime prophecies are
not about human kings or presidents; they are not about physical nations.
Rather, they are about ideologies, about the mental state of human beings,
about who rules these mental states or landscapes. They are about the Church
and about what happens when those who are born of Spirit are empowered by the
Holy Spirit as the Body becomes the Bride. They are about eliminating those who
teach falsely or presumptuously. They are about the fall of spiritual
Anyone who would cause a little one to look to physical nations to fulfill Bible prophecies is a false prophet. No exceptions exist.
*
The person conducting the Sabbath service should close services with two hymns, or psalms, followed by a prayer asking God’s dismissal.
* * * * *
"Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright ©2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved."